Should medical reports to Hospital Managers Panels always be completed by the R.C. or is it acceptable for someone else to put forward a report instead?
The Code of Practice at para 38.27 states:
āHospital managers should ensure that mechanisms are in place so that, in advance of the hearing, managersā panels are provided with written reports from the patientās responsible clinician and from other key individuals directly involved in the patientās care as appropriate, such as the patientās care co-ordinator, named nurse, social worker, occupational therapist or clinical psychologist.ā
However, itās common in Tribunals for a Core Trainee to draft the report and it be counter-signed by the RC. Iād say the actual RCs arenāt available for around 30% of my hearings.
Thank you for that itās very useful. I donāt suppose there is any real come back if Code of Practice isnāt followed though?
The Managers could keep adjourning if they think evidence from the RC is a necessity before moving forward with a review of the section.
The only avenue from the patients perspective would be JR - the case of Munjaz makes clear that a Code of Practice is legally binding unless there are good reasons to depart from it.
Much appreciated Zac.
Having been on the working group for the review of the Code and for that chapter in particular, my recollection is that āā¦panels are provided with written reports from the patientās responsible clinicianā¦ā was deliberately worded in that way, to reflect the fact that someone other than the RC could be the author, but the RC would āprovideā it, as in the report would be their responsibility and so i.e. they would counter-sign it to show that they had read and agreed with it. As is the case with reports for Tribunals.
Thatrās really useful Guy. I see what you are saying regarding āprovided withā. I can see your point.
On another issue, the Colonel Munjaz decision is very interesting re the status of the Code of Practice- I presume it was appealed but I donāt remember hearing about it.