We have just had a s23 sent to us nearly an hour before the time it was said to have been dated.
What do we all think about that?
Wasn’t there a thread about this a while back and the conclusion was that there is no power for a RC to defer a discharge? (Unlike a CTO for example). I think the previous thread related to the Tribunal closing the case before the date/time of the purported deferred discharge.
I suppose it leaves scope for the RC to try and “revoke” the discharge, which again I don’t agree they have the power to do.