October 2025 update

Website

  • Magic Book. The Magic Book is a database of contact details. The main idea is to add the hospitals and other places you visit (not just your own place of work). To create/edit contacts, there is no need to log in and the process is very quick and simple. See Magic Book

  • Mental Health Law Online CPD scheme: 12 points for £60. Obtain 12 CPD points online by answering monthly questionnaires. The scheme is an ideal way to obtain your necessary hours, or to evidence your continued competence. It also helps to support the continued development of this website, and your subscriptions (and re-subscriptions) are appreciated. For full details and to subscribe, see CPD scheme.

  • Cases. By the end of this month, Mental Health Law Online contained 2517 categorised cases

  • Chronology. See October 2025 chronology for this month’s changes to the website in date order.

Cases

  • Case (Suicide of detained patient). Saranveer Sihota: Chesterfield Borough Council (PFD report, 23 October 2025) — The patient had left the Hartington mental health unit at the Callow site in Chesterfield without permission or staff knowledge, and took a taxi to a local building with a wall which was low internally but had a 70ft drop externally. The matters of concern included that “there appears to be a clear risk that, either deliberately or accidentally, people might fall to the ground with high chance of death”, a list of previous incidents involving others, and that it “may reasonably be considered that others with thoughts of suicide may similarly consider that location”.

  • Case (Capacity to instruct). Furley Page LLP v KFL [2025] EWHC 1703 (SCCO) — It was argued on behalf of KFL that he had lacked capacity to enter into a retainer so should not have to pay £71,850.64 in legal fees.

  • Case (Reporting restrictions). Norfolk County Council v CA & Ors [2025] EWCOP 16 (T3) — The court decided to remove the part of the Transparency Order preventing publication of “any material that identifies or is likely to identify the specific relationship between [CA] and the defendant”, so that Caroline Grady could be identified as CA’s daughter, and therefore the link between two previous published judgments (fact finding and contempt) could be acknowledged.

  • Case (Capacity, inherent jurisdiction). Norfolk County Council v CA [2024] EWCOP 64 (T3) — The court found facts in relation to a variety of allegations (about DA’s treatment of her 79-year-old mother CA), considered capacity in various areas (including litigation, care, property and affairs, making and revoking LPAs) and best interests, and the inherent jurisdiction to protect vulnerable adults.

  • Case (Capacity to instruct). Aina Khan Law Ltd v Legal Ombudsman [2025] EWHC 1319 (Admin) — The Legal Ombudsman’s conclusion that the solicitor had not adequately assessed her client’s capacity when taking her on as a client and carrying out work on her behalf was irrational.

  • Case (Cross-sex hormones). ATN v BTN [2025] EWHC 1325 (Fam) — The court agreed to the instruction of an expert endocrinologist in relation to the GP’s ongoing prescription of spironolactone and oestrogen to a 17-year-old, but did not agree to the instruction of an expert psychiatrist to assess whether the patient had capacity to take decisions with respect to it and its psychiatric impact.

  • Case (Capacity to enter into contract). Rogers v Wills [2025] EWHC 1367 (Ch) — The claimant had been principal carer for her mother prior to death, and sued her brother (now executor of the estate) for payment, with claims in contract and unjust enrichment. Part of the judgment involved deciding whether the mother had had capacity to enter into a contract to be cared for at the claimant’s home for a reasonable price.

  • Case (Litigation capacity). M v Navis [2022] EWHC 221 (QB) — “There are before the Court an appeal and three applications. Each concerns the position of the Official Solicitor in this litigation.”

  • Case (Litigation capacity). M v Navis [2025] EWHC 759 (KB) — The fundamental question that underpinned all issues was whether the claimant was able, and whether he had been able in May 2023 (when he had discontinued proceedings), to use and weigh information as part of the process of making decisions, in the context of litigation, within the meaning of s3(1)(c) Mental Capacity Act 2005.

  • Case (Contempt sentencing). Norfolk County Council v Grady (Re CA) [2025] EWCOP 15 (T3) — The judge found that the defendant had breached undertakings and an injunction, and sentenced her (with a fine) for contempt.

Legislation

  • Legislation. Supported Housing (Regulatory Oversight) Act 2023 — “An Act to make provision about the regulation of supported exempt accommodation; to make provision about local authority oversight of, and enforcement powers relating to, the provision of supported exempt accommodation; and for connected purposes.”

Resources

News

  • CPD scheme. The CPD scheme is now fully up to date, with 12 tests online relating to the past 12 months’ website updates (6 MHA tests and 6 MCA tests). The CPD scheme is primarily aimed at mental health solicitors, and is an ideal way to evidence your continued competence, but is also suitable for barristers, psychiatrists, social workers and psychiatric nurses. You can subscribe or resubscribe for £75, or take a test, by visiting the CPD scheme page.

Events

  • Event. Event:Ministry of Justice: Supervised discharge (online, 25 November 2025) — “Supervised Discharge – the power to discharge capacitous restricted patients with conditions that amount to a deprivation of liberty. This session will be led by one of our Senior Management Team members. It will be as interactive as possible so you will have an opportunity to ask as many questions as you like. Alternatively, if you would like to raise a question or topic of interest to be discussed during the session you can let us know in advance by emailing mhcscpst@justice.gov.uk.” Time: 10.30am to 11.30am. Cost: free. See Microsoft Teams website for further details and booking information.

Jobs