LGSCO decision not to investigate

Continuing the discussion from Aftercare accommodation and "original condition":

This probably does not link directly to this specific matter, but the form of words used in my contact with LGSCO may be worth a branch off for discussion, …arises from or is related to … In my case a decision not to investigate a complaint to county council ( and trust) of non compliant recommendation for section 2 detention was based on Local Government Act 6a and Health Service Commission 4 (1) (a) which states ‘whether the matters complained about are those that could be, or that could have been appealed’ this was to another remedy which was a MHA Tribunal which does not deal with this non compliance case, it deals with real time release decisions. The wording presented for justification not to investigate was ‘whether the matters complained about are connected to those that could be, or that could have been appealed’. The addition of the words connected to gives the impression of relevance, and could be seen as not quite … Match with …the need for the accommodation arises from, or is related to. Perhaps a use of words that LGSCO finds useful.

Referring back to a split off topic ‘LGSCO decision not to investigate’ from some of the comments in this Aftercare topic are the decisions of LGSCO in some more cases questionable with regard to compliance and may it be a systemic problem with LGSCO?