I represent a patient with working diagnosis of ‘drug induced psychosis’ and argued no nature or degree at MHT. In reasons the MHT accepts nature not met and agrees no symptoms at time of MHT except lack of insight into having had DIP.
I don’t think lack of insight should be counted as a symptom of mental disorder and am planning to appeal. The case of Smith equates degree with the ‘current manifestation’ of Mental disorder. Any views?
I’ve always thought of insight as relevant to nature (with its link to prognosis) but I’ve heard people link it with degree (as it often improves when symptoms do) – the whole thing is a bit like the emperor’s new clothes. Definitely appeal, partly for guidance, and partly (whether it’s part of nature or degree or both) because it doesn’t sound like enough to keep someone locked up.