A new client has been on a CTO since April, albeit for the majority of it ‘informally’ staying at various different hospitals for months at a time.
It doesn’t sit right with me. Four different hospitals have accepted him throughout this period, yet still it is felt the CTO is necessary throughout that time.
How can his current RC & AMHP agree to renewal when the CTO provides no benefit whatsoever. Just days after this his CTO is then revoked and from what I can gather there has been no particular reason for it.
It seems so unnecessary and backward! I thought I would share this to see whether anybody had any thoughts?