— The claimant sought reconsideration as the original decision contained no specific decision in relation to one of the argued detriments, part 1 of which was her suspension in relation to administration of covert medication, and part 2 of which was the inadequate appeal against dismissal. Part 1 was presented out of time but part 2 was presented in time. The tribunal rejected the respondent's argument that its Article 6 rights would be breached by a finding being made months after the trial, but went on to decide that the appeal was part of the dismissal so was excluded as a detriment and, an any event, was not motivated by the public interest disclosures.
Full details available at: https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Dr_A_Malik_v_Cygnet_Behavioural_Health_Ltd_(reconsideration)_(2021)_MHLO_7_(ET)?id=021224-2152