— (1) The Parole Board's decision not to release the prisoner after the MHT's decision that he would be entitled to conditional discharge did not meet the test for irrationality (which is that "the release decision was so outrageous in its defiance of logic or accepted moral standards that no sensible person who had applied his mind to the question to be decided could have arrived at it"). (2) The PB decision contained some ambiguous wording but this did not amount to a fundamental mistake of fact.
Full details available at: https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Re_Davies_(Reconsideration)_(2023)_PBRA_98?id=100225-1223