Case (Hybrid order vs hospital order). R v Turner [2025] EWCA Crim 1867

— The appellant had been convicted of diminished responsibility manslaughter, for shooting a man in a pub with a crossbow, and given a life sentence with a minimum term of 7 years and 61 days alongside a hybrid order under s45A. He argued that he ought instead to have received a restricted hospital order or, alternatively, that the tariff was manifestly excessive. The Court of Appeal decided that the trial judge had correctly followed Sentencing Council, 'Manslaughter: Definitive guideline' (1 November 2018) in respect to both grounds, noting in particular that the court should consider a hybrid order prior to a hospital order, that the court should reflect upon the importance of the penal element in a sentence, and that the judge had been entitled to conclude when considering recall and wider public protection that a hybrid order was better in this case.
Full details available at: https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/R_v_Turner_(2025)_EWCA_Crim_1867?id=250426-1512