# \#inherent-jurisdiction

**URL:** https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/tag/inherent-jurisdiction/62.md

[Latest](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/latest.md) · [Categories](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/categories.md) · [Tags](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/tags.md)

---

## [Vulnerable adult can travel to paedophile partner in Brazil](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/vulnerable-adult-can-travel-to-paedophile-partner-in-brazil/885)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Jonathan](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/u/Jonathan)\
**Replies:** 5\
**Last updated:** [22 June 2022 13:24 UTC](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/vulnerable-adult-can-travel-to-paedophile-partner-in-brazil/885 "2022-06-22T13:24:54Z")

</div>

A lot of capacity/COP judgments are disturbing in one way or another, but this one stood out from the crowd: London Borough of Islington v EF \[2022\] EWHC 803 (Fam). I’m genuinely not sure whether the judge was right abo…
