# CTO Paper Reviews - billing

**URL:** <https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/cto-paper-reviews-billing/1930>\
**Category:** Other\
**Tags:** legal-aid\
**Created:** [11 October 2023 12:11 UTC](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/cto-paper-reviews-billing/1930 "2023-10-11T12:11:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lmcadams13954](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/dc4da7/32.png) [@Lmcadams13954](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/u/Lmcadams13954)\
**Post date:** [11 October 2023 12:11 UTC](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/cto-paper-reviews-billing/1930/1 "2023-10-11T12:11:02Z")

</div>

This may be a silly question with an obvious answer but I just cannot appear to find what I am looking for. If a CTO client opts for a paper review, is the file billed as a level 1 and 2 file due to no attendance at a hearing?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AdamMarley](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/59ef9b/32.png) [@AdamMarley](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/u/AdamMarley)\
**Post date:** [11 October 2023 14:15 UTC](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/cto-paper-reviews-billing/1930/2 "2023-10-11T14:15:56Z")

</div>

Yes… you won’t be charging attendance at a hearing and no advocacy so it’s only L2

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lmcadams13954](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/dc4da7/32.png) [@Lmcadams13954](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/u/Lmcadams13954)\
**Post date:** [11 October 2023 15:17 UTC](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/cto-paper-reviews-billing/1930/3 "2023-10-11T15:17:43Z")

</div>

Thought so - thank you very much.