# Case (Reporting restrictions). Norfolk County Council v CA & Ors \[2025\] EWCOP 16 (T3)

**URL:** <https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/case-reporting-restrictions-norfolk-county-council-v-ca-ors-2025-ewcop-16-t3/4420>\
**Category:** MHLO updates\
**Created:** [8 October 2025 11:17 UTC](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/case-reporting-restrictions-norfolk-county-council-v-ca-ors-2025-ewcop-16-t3/4420 "2025-10-08T11:17:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MHLO](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/user_avatar/forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/mhlo/32/24_2.png) [@MHLO](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/u/MHLO)\
**Post date:** [8 October 2025 11:17 UTC](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/case-reporting-restrictions-norfolk-county-council-v-ca-ors-2025-ewcop-16-t3/4420/1 "2025-10-08T11:17:00Z")

</div>

— The court decided to remove the part of the Transparency Order preventing publication of "any material that identifies or is likely to identify the specific relationship between [CA] and the defendant", so that Caroline Grady could be identified as CA's daughter, and therefore the link between two previous published judgments (fact finding and contempt) could be acknowledged.

* * *
Full details available at: [https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Norfolk\_County\_Council\_v\_CA\_%26\_Ors\_(2025)\_EWCOP\_16\_(T3)?id=081025-1117](https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Norfolk_County_Council_v_CA_%26_Ors_(2025)_EWCOP_16_(T3)?id=081025-1117)