# Case (Inherent jurisdiction and Article 3). Re P (Vulnerable adult: Withdrawal of application) \[2024\] EWHC 1882 (Fam)

**URL:** <https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/case-inherent-jurisdiction-and-article-3-re-p-vulnerable-adult-withdrawal-of-application-2024-ewhc-1882-fam/2822>\
**Category:** MHLO updates\
**Created:** [10 October 2024 12:07 UTC](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/case-inherent-jurisdiction-and-article-3-re-p-vulnerable-adult-withdrawal-of-application-2024-ewhc-1882-fam/2822 "2024-10-10T12:07:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MHLO](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/user_avatar/forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/mhlo/32/24_2.png) [@MHLO](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/u/MHLO)\
**Post date:** [10 October 2024 12:07 UTC](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/case-inherent-jurisdiction-and-article-3-re-p-vulnerable-adult-withdrawal-of-application-2024-ewhc-1882-fam/2822/1 "2024-10-10T12:07:00Z")

</div>

— The central issue in this case was whether the court should continue to use its powers under the inherent jurisdiction to compel P to live apart from her father. The judgement focusses on whether concluding proceedings would breach P's Article 3 rights.

* * *
Full details available at: [https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Re\_P\_(Vulnerable\_adult:\_Withdrawal\_of\_application)\_(2024)\_EWHC\_1882\_(Fam)?id=101024-1207](https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Re_P_(Vulnerable_adult:_Withdrawal_of_application)_(2024)_EWHC_1882_(Fam)?id=101024-1207)