Case (Coronavirus vaccination). North Yorkshire Clinical Commissioning Group v E [2022] EWCOP 15

— The judge followed the orthodox view in deciding that administering a coronavirus vaccination was in E's best interests despite objections from some family members, and offered guidance which concluded that "disagreements amongst family members about P being vaccinated which are at their root disagreements about the rights and wrongs of a national vaccination programme are not suitable for determination by the court. It will be in P's best interests to avoid delay and for differences to be resolved without recourse to court proceedings."
Full details available at: https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/North_Yorkshire_Clinical_Commissioning_Group_v_E_(2022)_EWCOP_15?id=230722-2156