# Applicability of s72 to restricted patients

**URL:** <https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/applicability-of-s72-to-restricted-patients/587>\
**Category:** Mental Health Act\
**Created:** [2 August 2021 15:45 UTC](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/applicability-of-s72-to-restricted-patients/587 "2021-08-02T15:45:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joolsleeds](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/user_avatar/forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/joolsleeds/32/56_2.png) [@Joolsleeds](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/u/Joolsleeds)\
**Post date:** [2 August 2021 15:45 UTC](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/applicability-of-s72-to-restricted-patients/587/1 "2021-08-02T15:45:28Z")

</div>

Sorry I am not a lawyer but just trying to understand if [Section 72 1 b ii - MHA](https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/20/section/72)

“_that it is necessary for the health of safety of the patient or for the protection of other persons that he should receive such treatment;_”

applies to restricted patients.

It seems to have been amended by the notes in [Section 73](https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/20/section/73) - but I can’t make out what the amendments relate to.

Sorry if I’m being dense, but grateful for any advice. Thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MentalHealthCop](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/6a8cbe/32.png) [@MentalHealthCop](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/u/MentalHealthCop)\
**Post date:** [2 August 2021 18:23 UTC](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/applicability-of-s72-to-restricted-patients/587/2 "2021-08-02T18:23:32Z")

</div>

Reads as if it’s just saying the Tribunal must discharge any patient from hospital if they are not satisfied that the two tests are met - s72(1)(b)(i) and (ii).

These are just the original tests that apply to someone being ‘sectioned’ in the first place, whether under s3 MHA or s37 MHA.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Rook](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/ecb155/32.png) [@Richard\_Rook](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/u/Richard_Rook)\
**Post date:** [4 August 2021 18:22 UTC](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/applicability-of-s72-to-restricted-patients/587/3 "2021-08-04T18:22:16Z")

</div>

Yes, it does apply to restricted patients.

The combined effect of ss72(1) & 73(1) is that the Tribunal must discharge a restricted patient if it is not satisfied that all three of the following are true:

(i) that he is then suffering from mental disorder or from mental disorder of a nature or degree which makes it appropriate for him to be liable to be detained in a hospital for medical treatment; [72(1)(b)(i)]  
(ii) that it is necessary for the health of safety of the patient or for the protection of other persons that he should receive such treatment; [s72(1)(b)(ii)];  
(iii) that appropriate medical treatment is available for him; [s72(1)(b)(iia)]

BUT for restricted patients the Tribunal then also has to decide whether the discharge is to be absolute or conditional. If the Tribunal is “satisfied that it is not appropriate for the patient to remain liable to be recalled to hospital for further treatment” (s73(1)(b)), the discharge must be absolute (ie the patient is discharged from detention once and for all).

If the Tribunal isn’t satisfied about that, the discharge will be conditional (s73(2)), In which case the patient is discharged from detention and can leave hospital subject to conditions, but remains “liable to be detained” (s73(3) which means, in effect, that they can be recalled to hospital in future if necessary (s73(4)).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joolsleeds](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/user_avatar/forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/joolsleeds/32/56_2.png) [@Joolsleeds](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/u/Joolsleeds)\
**Post date:** [4 August 2021 19:21 UTC](https://forum.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/t/applicability-of-s72-to-restricted-patients/587/4 "2021-08-04T19:21:20Z")

</div>

Thanks very much, that’s very helpful.
